By Jackie Mason & Raoul Felder

Published December 12th, 2002 

            Why would most Jewish people prefer being attacked by a mob of contaminated turtles than be caught voting for a Republican? What does this dread and fear of Republicans come from?

            Since the presidency of FDR, which is now about 60 years ago, the Jews still have the fixed image in their minds of the Democrats as the symbol of salvation and the Republicans to them are thieves, frauds, exploiters, lowlifes, and opportunists.
The truth is that the Jews are half-right if they are judging the Republicans of 60 years ago. But, they act as if they left the country at that time and since then have been suffering from Alzheimer’s.

            You don’t have to buy a calendar to know that 60 years ago was not yesterday. The Jews are either oblivious to reality or feel such a panic attack just from hearing the word Republican, that they quiver as if they were hit by lightening or got caught with an 11 year old girl who just announced that she is pregnant.

            Both parties have changed since 60 years ago the only difference is that the Republican changed for the better and the Democrats changed for the worse.

            If the Democrat had any respect for the truth they would drop the name “Democrat” and present the title to the Republicans, because the Republicans stand for exactly the same policies that the Democrats abandoned many years ago.

            Sixty years ago Roosevelt fought for the right of equal jobs for all minorities, but now the Democrats have invented something called affirmative action, which should really be called negative retribution. It created something unheard of in a democracy. Affirmative Action is not a fight for equality it is a reward for irresponsibility. It claims to stand for equal opportunity. That is a fraud! It really stands for opportunity without equality, because it demands the right to deprive opportunity for anyone who cannot qualify as a minority.

            Ironically the greatest defenders of Affirmative Action are the Jews who feel so guilty for just making a living, that they will do anything for someone labeled “minority,” although they would never do it even for their own children. If their own child was 20 years old and refused to go to college, refused to get a job, and refused to get up in the morning he would find himself not only thrown out of the house, he would even more likely be thrown out of a window. But if he is a member of a minority, a Jew suddenly becomes his psychiatrist, benefactor, and fundraiser because without even knowing him a Jew feels that it is his own fault if somehow his back can’t even get off the bed.

Giving, caring, sharing, and sacrifice are nurtured in the Jewish home to the point of harassment. That is why a Jew is like a man in a boxing ring fighting with his conscience about whether he has done enough to help. Which translated means every minority except the Jews.

            Since he is guilt-ridden for coming out of poverty he has to help other minority people as quickly as possible and no matter how much he does he is always pleading forgiveness for not having done enough. That is why no Jew can think that Affirmative Action should also include the Jew. He feels that if he made it so can another Jew.

And if the existence of anti-Semitism didn’t stop him it shouldn’t stop you.

            But if he is Black, Hispanic, red, green or a mixture of orange and pink a Jew is convinced that unless he can become a lawyer without passing the test he will be forced to remain a janitor in the building for the rest of his life.

           The Jews are so guilt-ridden that they can’t even remember their own victimization under the constant plague of anti-Semitism. They think of themselves as co-conspirators with the white Protestants who persecuted the minorities of this country, but they keep forgetting that they were never a member of that club. They are still never invited to join and even now most gentile clubs still have a hidden sign under the chief officers tablecloth that says “No Jews Allowed”.

            And what is still true of most country clubs was until recently true of what Jewish people faced when they were looking for a job. How could a thinking man manage to forget that until recently it was as hard for a Jew to get a job in a major corporation as it was for him to become the Pope? Almost every ad in the New York Times read “White Christian Only” ’til as late as 1960. Obviously they can’t remember it because it might eliminate too many guilt trips and a Jew can’t live without it.

            As far as the Jews are concerned, the Democrats can’t do any wrong and the Republicans can’t do anything right. When it was discovered that the secretary of state to the elder President Bush somehow used that well-known epithet “F- the Jews”, the popularity of the Bush Administration couldn’t withstand the shock and they were condemned by the Jews as hopeless anti-Semites who would have been hung if this were a society of decent people.

           But when Hillary Clinton was caught making blatantly vulgar anti-Semitic remarks, Jews reacted with contempt not for her but for the people who had the nerve to publicly mention it.

            When the headlines quoted her as calling someone an “F—ing Jew bastard”, after he offered to take the lie detector test and passed it with such high honors that if he was in college it would have made him the Valedictorian, it still didn’t stop her. She then claimed that he was not only a liar but also a thief, a lowlife, and a degenerate, unaware that she was stealing all the names that her husband had been called for 8 years.
Even if she went from house to house calling every Jew the same names she had called this innocent man it couldn’t diminish her popularity among Jews for a second. She already had bought immunity from prosecution from any Jew the day that the word Democrat was attached to her name.

            The proof is that even after she hugged Yassar Arafat’s wife, kissed her and praised her and even after she demanded a Palestinian state before even asking to protect Jewish lives from suicide bombers, she still wound up with by far the majority of the Jewish vote in her Senatorial campaign.

            If she were a Republican the whole American army wouldn’t have been armed with enough equipment to protect her. It has been proven a hundred times that a Republican can’t get more than 30% of the Jewish vote even if he saved every Jew from drowning.
The Prime Minister of Israel Yitzhak Rabin once confided to us during a private meeting that the two presidents that did the most to save the state of Israel were Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon. But if this information was blasted into every Jewish home in America 30% will still be the fence that no Republican could ever climb over, because it is a hopeless case if you happen to be a Republican.

            Nobody in America including the Jews themselves has worked harder than Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell to support the state of Israel. They have dedicated almost every sermon, every speech and every prayer fighting for the Israeli side in every argument about the state of Israel.

            But the Jews suffer from such blank prejudice towards Republicans that they can’t except what they are hearing. They believe Hillary Clinton while desperately campaigning for the Jewish vote is suddenly telling the truth, because somehow a Democrat can’t lie.
But these two religious ministers who are bringing a message which comes from what they interpret as the word of G-d and the words of their scriptures are suspected of having some mysterious hidden agenda and therefore shall not be trusted.

            In plain English when they hear the word Republican, especially when connected with the words “far right” to the Jews they become more dangerous than leprosy and they feel they better get out of town before they catch it.

Vlog 54 Dems Fear Petraeus More Than Bin Laden

           With Gen. David Petraeus’s report coming out soon and Bin Laden’s tape Just coming out, whose message do the Democrats fear more?

            Hillary Clinton recently said that another Terrorist attack would only help the Republicans, but success in Iraq makes them quake in their boots. Petraeus months ago was touted by the Democrats as the best option for command in Iraq. If he can’t do the job, no one can! And now this same man, according to the Democratic leadership who unanimously confirmed him, can’t be trusted and will no doubt skew his report in the Presidents favor. Why are the Dems changing their opinion of the General you ask? Because months ago they counted on him to lose and now their worst fear may becoming true. G-d Bless America indeed! With “Leaders” like the ones we have in Congress right now, we need all the help we can get.

Click here to see the video

Jackie Mason Vlog 55 Democrats Have Gone Far Beyond Treason

            A post Petraeus hearing follow-up to my previous vlog from Sunday, September 9th “Dems Fear Petraeus More Than Bin Laden”

            The Democrats have proven themselves to be more reprobate and treasonous than even I could have predicted in my last vlog. They treated General Petraeus, this American hero who serves his country bravely, like a pig to slaughter. They never intended to hear good news from him. This was a set-up all along. A cold calculated plan they maneuvered months ago to take whatever the report was and skew it to their agenda. Hillary Clinton mentioned to believe the General’s report you must “…suspend your disbelief.” Well I’m in absolute disbelief how treacherous and treasonous this party has become.

click here to see the video

Weekly musings by Jackie Mason & Raoul Felder

Thoughts On E-mail

            People used to say, “Do right and fear no man; don’t right and fear no woman.”  And now e-mails have supplanted old fashioned snail mail, but yet, no such caution seems to be involved.  It seems that people feel that when they sit in front of their computer alone at night and type out all sorts of nonsense, somehow they are removed from responsibility for their missiles. 

           Currently, the Governor of New York appears, perhaps rightfully, perhaps wrongly, disinclined to release his e-mails that may be part of the scandal du jour, and, the Governor of New Jersey appears to be in trouble because of e-mails concerning his girlfriend, which he now, pursuant to a court order, has to turn over.  All of this is quite an apart and aside from the fact that any divorce lawyer will tell you about half of the people who come into their offices have a briefcase full of e-mails sent or received by a formerly believed-to-be-faithful spouse.  Various laws have been passed, such as one in New York, making it illegal to look at somebody else’s e-mail, but that doesn’t seem to deter jealous spouses.  They apparently operate under the proposition that if the computer is in their home, it is open season on whatever’s in it.

            Best advice:  don’t send e-mails of a personal nature unless you have no problem with your spouse – and eventually a judge – reading them.

Jackie Mason Vlog 52 End Of Summer Round-up

            Here we go.  As the summer draws to a near, Gonzales quits for doing nothing, Larry Craig gets in trouble for touching a toilet stall and for having a wide stance, and Clinton and other Democrats try to bury some “Shoe Money.”  What a crazy world of politics this is.

Click here to see the video

Jackie Mason Vlog 53 Fred Thompson Isn’t Late, The Others Are Early

            The experts are claiming that because Fred Thompson joined the campaign too late, that it will hurt him.  One of the first candidates to officially announce his bid for president was Sen. Brownback.  What has joining the campaign early done for him?  Here’s my advice to you… stop listening to the pundits.  They can’t tell you who will be president better than my sister-in-law from Pittsburg can.

Click here to see the video

Weekly musings by Jackie Mason & Raoul Felder

GLOBAL WARMING

Obviously, anybody this side of a lunatic asylum would not suggest that all the poisons, automobile omissions, factory smoke, and cow flatulations that go into the atmosphere could be doing any of us any good.  Of course, the cow flatulation problem could easily be resolved by mixing substantial amounts of Gas-X in with the hay.  But there is apparently a substantial amount of scientific authority (ranging from the scientists at NASA, the Brookhaven Laboratory, and various universities) that cannot merely be ascribed to payments from financially invested corporations suggesting that global warming is more hype than reality.  But one thing should be plain to even non-scientific types, and that is, simple arithmetic.

In 2003, there was a monumental heat wave across Europe killing approximately 35,000 people – 2,000 in the U.K. alone.  This is an awful and painful statistic.  But worse is the fact that many more people die from the cold each winter.  In England alone, approximately 25,000 people usually die each year from the cold.  In Europe, over the same period that approximately 200,000 people died from heat, approximately 1.5 million Europeans died from the cold.  Also, probably because of expanding use of air conditioners, the death rate from heat is continually being reduced.
          

Logically, the same global warming, whether one believes it is something we cause, or it is just one of those ebbs and flows that happen in the history of the world, at the same time saves many more lives by reducing the greater number of people who would otherwise die from the cold winters.  The arithmetic, though cruel and unfair, is simple, and suggests we need more research, and the fact that we should not facilely accept the fact that global warming is a people-created killer – or even is an unnatural phenomenon.

Jackie Mason vlog 50 “Spell Boloney H-I-L-L-A-R-Y”

            On Hillary Clinton’s recent statement that a terror attack would help republicans.

            To watch the video click here

Jackie Mason vlog 51 “The Lowest Common Denominator”

            In this country we still have all these rigid moral laws, dictating “Decency” on broadcast waves. You can’t say this, you can’t show that, etc. But tell me what’s so decent about a commercial for erectile dysfunction, herpes medicine that allows you to be promiscuous without guilt, or curing diarrhea? Every other ad on TV or radio is absolutely disgusting. Where is the FCC on this? Fine Howard Stern $1,000,000 for saying the “F” word, give The Sopranos an Emmy. What the h*** is decent anymore?

            To watch the video click here

            What I’m telling you is nothing new.  I may not be the first to talk about it, and I certainly hope I’m not the last.  But for all the complaints about political correctness you hear from mainstream sources, these sources still promote this sick practice even more today, then ever before.

            When the Imas story was all you heard about for weeks, you heard condemnations all the time that what he said was disgusting and horrible, but not everybody thought he should’ve been fired.  Even those like Hannity, and myself, who always disagreed with him, and didn’t care about him one bit, were outrages that he was fired from his job.  Now, months after the fact, one of the woman from the Rutgers team is suing Imas on the grounds that she’ll always be labeled a “Ho” by potential suitors and employees throughout her life.  “Look honey, nobody knew who you were until you publicized yourself in the civil suit.”  Because this young woman is a “victim” of Imas’s words, no one is brave enough to call her out as the greedy person she is, to capitalize on this for a pay day.  That, if there is any fairness in the world, should keep suitors and prospective employees away.

            And today, as we try to stop Muslim extremism and terrorists, those words too are swiftly being removed from sight and sound.  Illegal Immigrants, a PC term  itself when it was first created (as opposed to refugee, displaced person, W.O.P. which  stood for “With Out Papers” before it became a derogatory term specifically aimed at Italian Americans, etc.), is being replaced by “migrant worker”.  I have two that are much better in my opinion, “Border Challenged” or “Uninvited Guest”.

For more, go to my video by clicking here

John Edwards should thank G-d that this country’s sycophantic press is easy on him and his fellow democrats. His hypocrisy and double speak would’ve got him buried a long time ago if he had been a conservative.

Edwards, the describer of Two Americas, invested in a hedge fund that took advantage of Hurricane Katrina victims. He told his fellow candidates to give up all money from News Corp, yet took money from one of their subsidiaries, Harper Collins, and spewed a buch of double speak when confronted about that. Forget about how rich he is and all the extravagance he has, while saying he’s a “champion for the poor”. That just shows what a plain hypocrite he is. Now he’s an out and out crook, and where is the media? Where is the outrage? A better question is where is democracy? A “one party”, sycophantic press and a Democratic Party hell bent on promoting an agenda, partners in the destruction of democracy.

For more, click here

What did Karl Rove do to deserve so much hate from the left? How did this Intelligent, humble, easy going’ guy from Texas become one of the most hated men in America?

The only crime that Karl Rove committed, at least the definition of the word crime on the left, is that he helped Bush win, not only once, but twice. Excuse me; he helped steal the election for Bush, not once, but twice. He was the master of the Cabal in 2002 to steal back the Senate and was probably behind every other Bad thing Bush did, or accused of, from orchestrating 9/11 to outing agent 99, Valerie Plame. To liberals, there is no actual crime this man could’ve committed, that equals getting Bush elected. You ask a liberal what crime Rove committed, they answer, “Oh like you don’t know… you know… whatever it was… it was bad… he stole the election… NO WAR FOR OIL!” You get the idea.

Click here to see the video…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDUV2ZyDBTI

How can we say the economy is bad today? The anti-Bush crowd just hates to admit that our economy is better than ever. With the recent market volatility, they now have there reason that Bush’s economy is in the toilet. Well, its Sub-Prime mortgages stupid, not the economy that’s in trouble.

Now the left tells us, “You see! We told you the economy under Bush stinks”. The recent market volatility is because of these sub-prime mortgages. All the experts say that these mortgages only make up 2% of all the mortgages, and mortgages themselves, only make up 12 % of the economy. Now the democrats are attacking Bush for not doing anything to help people who can’t pay their mortgages. Meanwhile, they’re promising that if they were in power they would bail these people out. To me, it is the height of depravity to prey on dumb people by promising them thing they could never give them. Why is it the government’s job to bail these people out? It all sounds good to say, but when will this country understand, that the government gets its money from the people, including those who can’t pay their mortgages.

Here’s more on the subject…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwQwZucG9yY

Why has legal and law enforcement system in this country, become more obsessed with catching people on technicalities, than catching people who commit actual crimes. Border agents, Ignacio Ramos and Jose Campeon, are sentenced to 12 years and jail, and not only does the drug dealer they shot trying to keep him from coming into this country get immunity from prosecution, he gets brought back to testify against the agents. And on another front, Critics of President Bush want to make absolutely sure, that Bush and the government are doing nothing to violate the civil liberties of terrorists and terror suspects, instead of trying to stop these villains. G-d forbid, we listen on a phone call or two of a terrorist. What the hell is wrong with us?